We are down to The Elite 8 in our Tournament to determine the Best Film of 2000-Now.
The above photo (click to enlarge) has all the Round 1, 2 and 3 Winners.
64 Films were cut to 32.
You can read Part I of the Round 1 Recap here.
You can read Part II of the Round 1 Recap here.
32 films were then cut to 16.
You can read the 32 to 16 Recap here.
Now, 16 Films have been chopped down to 8.
Vote on The Elite 8 in the Comments Section.
Dan (The North) is writing in italics.
Chris (The South) is writing in normal.
Sweet 16 to Elite 8 Recap:
Aronofsky/Scorsese Region:
The First Match of the Sweet 16 was a Best Picture Winner Crime Drama Showdown:
#1. THE DEPARTED vs. #4. NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN
This match really began when these films won Best Picture Oscars in consecutive years.
Both are epic dramas dealing with the law, the underworld and the personal ties of society.
Each had a director previously nominated for an Oscar and a cast full of big time actors.
I figured the hardest part would be comparing two, almost equally, incredible films.
However, some people took hard stances in one direction or the other.
I had a 30 minute conversation with a reader about the high points and meanings of each film.
In the end, I think he decided on DEPARTED because of the importance of the soundtrack.
Another was outraged that we were even taking votes: He had NO COUNTRY in a shut out.
The opinions of The North and The South were briefly split as well.
But in a Tournament, one film moves on and one gets the old compressed-air gun to the dome:
THE DEPARTED works overtime to oust NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN.
I liked NO COUNTRY, but I think the film suffers from being an adaptation of a beloved novel.
Every adaptation has the "it wasn't as good as the book" detractors.
That's because a movie is not a book.
Bad books can be great films (THE GODFATHER (the book wasn't terrible, but not great)).
I think NO COUNTRY is probably a great novel and a good film.
Watching it for the first time, I liked it, but had the feeling I was missing a lot of something.
Wide open spaces in films and novels are just different, I guess.
Marty does his thing (so well) and moves on to The Elite 8.
Next up was #2 Iron Man versus #3 Requiem for a Dream.
Both great in their own way, but two films that could not be on more opposite ends of the film spectrum.
Released way back in 2000, Darren Aronofsky's Requiem barely made the year cutoff to be included in the tourney, but it is showing tremendous staying power. I guess a movie that intense and memorable has a way of sticking with you (or haunting your nightmares is more like it).
Then there is Iron Man, a somewhat surprising hit from 2008. There are few movies that are a better example of why casting is so crucial. Could you imagine anyone else as billionaire-playboy-turned-superhero Tony Stark than Robert Downey, Jr.? But most imporantly, Iron Man can be credited with launching the entire multi-billion dollar Marvel/Avengers film universe, the now gold-standard for Hollywood franchises.
But when you weigh the merits of each film, Requiem for a Dream is clearly superior. The voting showed the same opinion, and Aronofsky's film advances. His reward is showdown with Scorsese, in a match-up for the championship of the region named for them.
Click Read More For The Rest of The Sweet 16 to Elite 8 Recap