First things first, I do not “hate”
The Wizard of Oz. I recognize and respect its lofty place in
film history and will even go as far to declare it one of the most important
films ever made. And of course I have seen the film many times (we had it on
VHS growing up, Dan and I even saw it together in film class), but to be
honest, it is just not a film I ever really enjoyed watching. If it comes on TV
(which is does, often), I have no real desire to sit down and watch it. But
that doesn’t mean I don’t appreciate it and it certainly doesn’t mean I should
be looking forward to this bright and colorful, cash-grab of a Disney “prequel.” In fact, if I did love the Wizard of Oz, I think I would be even more annoyed and disinterested in Oz The Great and Powerful.
My problems with this whole situation stems almost exclusively from new movie Oz, The Great Powerful, not the original. Dan himself points out several key factors of the film that everyone should worry about, including the sugar-coated look and the wild card cast.
I know Burton’s Alice in Wonderland made millions and
millions of dollars (and I am sure Oz will
too), but did anyone actually like that movie? Now this new film takes one of
the best and most unique aspects of the original movie (the transition from
black-and-white to color) and turns it up to 11 for no other reason than they the
fact that they can. Is a complete CGI background with live actors really what
people want? And it’s not like the animation is going to be particularly great or game-changing, but from a Disney company still reeling from the massive disaster of
John Carter and more concerned with
bright colors, cute animals, and marketable products than story and effects.
Next up, we have the cast. As
pointed out by Dan, James Franco can be great sometimes, other times he can
downright smug and annoying. He appears to be horribly miscast in this role; he
is not a family-fun actor and should probably stick to making documentaries
about art and pornography rather than trying to make it as a big name box-office
draw. Mila Kunis, like Franco, is enjoyable for the most part, but if she doesn’t
turn out to be the Wicked Witch it will be a confusing waste. And as for Michelle
Williams (despite being perfectly cast, apparently as the Good Witch) and
Rachel Weisz (who would make an even better Wicked Witch), I really have no idea why these two powerhouse, Oscar-winning
actresses are even in this movie, other than to make something their own little kids
can watch. On the other side of the camera, was Sam Raimi the right choice to
direct? Spider-Man is one thing, The Wizard of Oz is another. His horror-comedy sensibilities just don't
seem like a fit to me. And don't even peek at the other films the screenwriters have worked on.
And finally, regardless if I am a
Wizard of Oz fan or not, does anyone
honestly think that this new film will be even remotely worthy of such true
Hollywood classic? Why are people giving Oz,
The Great and Powerful a free pass when most are so willing to attack
Hollywood for being unoriginal and re-hashing proven franchises or producing
countless sequels/prequels, much less one of such a universal classic? And isn’t
it just kind of ripping off the popularity of the Wicked books and musical? (Haven’t seen or read either, just seems
pretty similar from what I have heard. I am sure Disney paid them off nicely).
Dan closes by saying “if Disney can revive 75% of the WIZARD'S shine, we are in for a real treat.” Well I don’t even think they can reproduce even 50%. Look, I am not wishing any ill will
towards the film. I hope it does do well, and I am sure it will, just don’t plan
on seeing me lining up for it and certainly not shelling out premium prices for
3-D. No disrespect to the original,
but Oz, The Great and Powerful just
looks awful.
And Dan, I'll be waiting patiently for your call after you go and see this non-sense, eager to hear your thoughts.
And Dan, I'll be waiting patiently for your call after you go and see this non-sense, eager to hear your thoughts.
No comments:
Post a Comment